Another Perfect Catastrophe
Unfocused, Biased, Irreverent & Irrelevant. A bit like you.
Manipulators
        

Am I the only one a bit worried by Bush playing up everything his administration is doing to smoothly hand over power?

A: It’s no big deal. Has been done about every 4-8 years dozens of times now.

B: How often does this administration do anything competently?

C: How many times has Bush announced he’s doing something while actually doing the opposite, like all the things he praised in State of the Union addresses that he cut severely the very next budget? Also the promises that use of force would be a ‘last resort’ in Iraq and that he needed the authorization to provide diplomatic pressure.

No comments

An open letter to all members of the Academy of Television Arts and Sciences:

Did you even watch Andromeda Strain? I know you received a screener of it. Was “For Your Consideration” and “Produced by Ridley Scott” all you needed to know about it to carbon copy its’ name back onto the nominations form?

4 hours of the most embarrassing, mindless dreck I watched this year–an absolute slap in the face to the original (which didn’t have a single element that wasn’t far and away superior–37 years ago–to this committee-stamped low budget travesty) gets SEVEN god-damned nominations?

Let’s put that in a little perspective. 13 hours of Battlestar Galactica got 6 nominations (counting one for a short-form featurette). The final Season of THE WIRE got exactly ONE NOMINATION–and THE WIRE has never been nominated for Best Drama. But, again, Andromeda Strain 2008 gets SEVEN NOMINATIONS.

I really hope whatever payola or influence peddling the production company used on you was worth both your personal dignity and whatever little dignity was left in your academy. I now have more respect for the Hollywood Foreign Press Association.

No comments

Mini-review of old-news Vantage Point.

Flying on a nice shiny Air Canada Embraer 190 yesterday I had the time to watch an inflight movie, so finally got around to seeing Vantage Point.

(I think I already know the answer to this, but…) Is it just me rooting for somebody to die when they make stupid decisions in movies, even if they’re traumatized little girls running across a busy road to their mommy? And that they show the murdering terrorist having time to make the exact wrong choice for his character, entirely unmotivated by a single frame of film that came before… It would’ve been so much more fun to watch if he’d made the pragmatic, logical decision…

And what the hell is it with misuse of video switchers in movies? Don’t some of the people working on film come from a *telecommunications* and film background, having had actually used a switcher for at least 5 minutes in college? You *switch* (hence the name video SWITCHer) cameras during a newscast (and just about everything else–except to occasionally mix things up during a concert–maybe), you do not do a fucking dissolve or Video Toaster wipe every take. Sheesh, I thought it was well established that the T-bar was only used TO FIRE THE DEATH STAR!

All that said, I liked the movie better than I thought I would. It was a good enough movie that I was pissed it wasn’t even better.

No comments

Separated At Birth?

I have to admit, as one of the 36 purchasers of WindowsMe, I immediately thought of the
similarity of the logos when Apple revealed it.

[pic of WindowsMe and MobileMe logos that I can't get to upload through blogger, dammit]
My current opinion of mobileMe (without having touched it, and I’m acting as if you care,
since it works in the Windows and online world, too),
1) Still too expensive. Make it $40/yr, and I’ll consider it.
2) Not enough storage space to do anything revolutionary for me. I’m sure Apple wants to
make sure they aren’t competing with their own backup solution (TimeMachine).
3) Where was it 3 years ago, when it was really needed!? Nowadays, people can expect
to have a laptop with them at all times (at $500 a pop, why not?), along with their cool-guy-phone
(less than $500 a pop), so they would be syncing their phone contacts and their computer
contacts all on their primary computer.
4) I still think it will help out many a person, and the online email seems nifty. Don’t think
I need it though, and for mere fraction a month I get really sweet web hosting with a lot more space.
No comments

Belated post about the flustercluck that was NAB 2008…

I find I only need to go to the big industry trade shows every-other year, but this last year at NAB was almost entirely worthless.

Personally, I go to NAB to SEE WHAT IS NOW AVAILABLE and to FIND OUT MORE ABOUT PRODUCTS. Back in the days of E3 there were two classes of people working the booths: company people and booth-babes. You didn’t expect much from the booth-babes, but they could swipe your badge, hand you some literature on the latest stuff and maybe point you towards a company person for more in-depth info. Plus they were pretty and pretended to not mind talking to endless waves of sweaty geeks.

NAB was at the other end of the spectrum, it’s named for the National Association of Broadcasters after all and is attended by many much-older engineers who don’t mind looking at a nice rack either–if it’s made by Winsted. Professional engineers (and sadly executives) looking for either in-depth technical info and/or the opportunity to schmooze and ‘network’ for contacts, other jobs, vendors, customers… That’s what it was AND IS SUPPOSED TO BE.

Now NAB is worth even less than E3 ever was because the mindless booth-babes are fully clothed and *don’t* have anything more than a flier with a web-address to hand out. Many of the people staffing the booths at this years NAB may have actually been full-time, regular employees of the companies–if you count lobotomized members of the marketing (redundant?) or maybe janitorial departments. As often as not they didn’t even have meaningful knowledge of their own company’s product line.

Again and again I’d ask somebody for information on something and they wouldn’t know what I was talking about. I’d ask them for at least the brochure on it, and at best they’d only have the generic full-line brochure (no specific information whatsoever). Next they’d offer to swipe my badge to get me the info, but as often as not they didn’t even understand what division the product I was asking about fell under, so they couldn’t specify it in the swipe system.

Even when one of these smiling badge-swiping simians could find the checkbox for the specific item I was wondering about the end result was not a detailed brochure in the mail the week after NAB; it was AN EMAIL WITH A WEB-LINK TO THE GENERIC INFO ON THEIR WEB PAGE. So what the HELL was the point of going to NAB at all??? Going to Vegas, sure, but I could’ve just browsed websites in the hotel’s business center, maybe printed a couple pages and had the same benefit as spending 2-3 days wandering around the show floors…

When everybody in the industry solemnly agrees the Internet killed this trade-show in 4 or so years, remember it is because THE TRADE SHOW ITSELF HELPED. When I walk up to a booth to find out more about something that I may well be about to spend several hundred thousand dollars on I want to speak to somebody involved in the design or AT LEAST the support of the product in question. NOT whichever vaguly attractive secretary some executive thought might put out.

Especially in broadcasting/production/VFX/post, we don’t have a Gizmodo.com to point out all the newest stuff, we have NAB–where companies made the conscious choice this year to NOT send their engineers, only MARKETING SHMUCKS (and executives… thank god!).

No comments

iPhone 2.0 Development Precursor

Perhaps flatteringly, Apple may be reading my thoughts.  It would be nice to think so, but I believe they are just smart enough to stay a step ahead on a lot of important matters.  Here’s a comment I sent to the Daring Fireball author regarding some iPhone 2.0 chaff that was shooting around the web at the time 2.0 was announced.  This particular post didn’t go anywhere, and the implementation Apple just announced is even better than I anticipated.  Read on, with small edits to put in context to a standalone post.

March 15th, 2008
Seems like there is a lot ruckus over the constraints of the iPhone 2.0 specs.  It’s good to see such passion–it appears many people want to make the iPhone their platform of choice.  But what of all the limitations? [... apps not allowed to remain running in background processes by Apple's SDK is a problem for many potential uses of custom apps on the iPhone.]
One possibility:  apps don’t have to live entirely self contained– maybe when they aren’t churning within the iPhone, their virtual counterpart lives on in a web-based server, doing its thing.
Take, for instance, a potential chat or instant messenger client.  It keeps a mirrored state of chats in progress, status of the user, etc, on the web side of the app, and acts like a native app locally.
From a user point of view:  Oops!  I have a call.  Switch to my phone mode, handle the call, flip through my calendar, and so on… meanwhile I’m receiving an IM on my no-longer running chat program.
The sever-mirror detects this, and instead of my iPhone acting offline or not receiving a message, it is instead sent an SMS-type message that reports ”Tom has sent you an IM”.  I then switch to my chat app where I’m re-synced with what I have missed while away from that app.
By transferring feedback to a different form of communication (webserver based), you have pierced the firewall of iPhone apps not running in a resident mode.
Maybe this sort of interrupt driven system could be petitioned for by developers–a special tagged SMS message that can be routed to a roster of apps in a manifest that’s checked upon
receiving that message.
Anyway, just thought I’d throw this out there to see if it sticks at all.
[end]
Well, seems I didn’t have to throw that out there at all.  Apple has it covered, and even better than I requested.  With their push system, an app can notify the iPhone via a text message with buttons to react to it, an alert sound, or a deck icon to reflect pending message.  Sweet.
No comments

Back on the kick

Getting back into the “making stuff for the web” kick.  Mostly trying to get my creative chops back up to speed.  Lots to do, lots to try.  

In the meantime, been working at dilatedPixels.  Not much to check out at the site, yet.  
The TShirt shop, ManicExpressive, is going to be reborn soon.  
And I’ve got a few other tricks up my sleeve coming soon, and I should probably rekindle some other projects that are just laying there.  
Watch for it to be announced here first!
I’ll have another “computer user experience suckiness” post soon as well.
No comments

Heathrow British Airways 777 incident

Since my favorite aviation forum turns out to have been run by idiots who just lost their entire message-center database and didn’t have external backups (and don’t apparently know about drivesavers.com) I’m going to post my $0.02 worth here.

I was uneasy with how quickly the crew were lauded as heroes, long before the flight data recorder had even been looked at. There is no doubt that they did an excellent job given the situation they found themselves in (something of a British Airways specialty, if you remember the 747 and volcanic ash incident), but I’m reserving my adulation until the cause of the situation is understood.

The first reports of complete loss of power implied a dead cockpit as well, I’m guessing this is an idiot reporter’s misunderstanding of what a pilot would mean by loss of power.

It is now fairly clear that the engines failed to respond to requests for additional thrust, both through the autothrottle and the manual throttles. That there didn’t seem to be any indication of the lack of response to the autothrottle requests is probably some kind of failure in the airplane’s system (or the system’s design). Had the crew been alerted to the abnormal response to ordered thrust increases earlier they may have had time to alter the glideslope, change configuration to extend the glide, or even possibly solve the reason for lack of thrust.

I do not believe the airplanes systems failed catastrophically, I.E. were not delivering orders or were ‘crashed’. It seems far more likely there was a problem with fuel contamination or icing in the engine. There is also a potential failure here of systems that should’ve warned of the icing possibility or contamination… or of the systems designed to prevent those problems.

If my postulations are correct some systems failures played a major part in the crash, and pilot skill played a major part in mitigation of the crash… BUT, what if the crew had been more hands-on with the approach? Would they have noticed the disconnect sooner? If they’d been monitoring engine performance the way a 2nd officer used to (instead of relying on the airplane’s systems to report a problem) might they have realized something was wrong? I don’t know… but I would like to.

No comments

Cockroaches and salesmen.

I worked my way through college as a commissioned salesman. I wasn’t good at it for two reasons: I was honest and I thought too much. I simply wasn’t able to slime and dumb myself down to being a good salesperson. But I feel I understand salespeople better than most, and because of that I despise them.

I have to deal with some real doozies for work, but it’s from a position of some power and I enjoy making sure to squeeze out every last cent I can and to catch and punish any BS they pull. I had thought car dealers were the top of the scuz pyramid, but because I’ve bought my last two cars through fleet dealers–with a little guidance from a great site, I usually don’t interact with them. Though that opinion was reconfirmed when I recently took a test drive, the salesperson was much like I had been (won’t last long) but I was damn near to throttling the ’sales manager’ who inserted himself into the conversation.

But even the worst used-car salesman I’ve ever dealt with is nothing compared to the horrorshow of humanity that seems to be real-estate agents. Luckily there are also some great ways to limit interactions with them, too… but eventually your luck will run out. It’s at that point I remember learning that there are three types of homicide: criminal, justifiable, and praiseworthy.

Some background: in Southern California right now the housing market is falling fast, after the bursting of a large bubble. There is a constant stream of news about declining home sales and median prices. The fall seems to be accelerating as people default on stupid loans, fewer people can get loans, and new housing continues to be completed. Then there is the current writer’s strike (and looming actor’s strike) which are a grave threat to the local economy. Add on for good measure the sub-prime banking crisis and other bad economic news (just heard unemployment is rising again) and people are talking about RECESSION.

So with all that in mind I decide to try to wade into the market (my apartment lease is up and I’m tired of living 20+ minutes from everything). I notice a place on my drive to work, it has a tacky sign about “Condo’s from the 500s”… but I’m encouraged when they replace that sign as the market stalls. So even though the place doesn’t look very good from the highway I stop in for a look. It’s nicer up close and inside is even better. I get my first whiff of stupidity when the salesgirl tries to imply that they’re already half sold then immediately tries to get me commit to a unit any unit to place an offer on. It’s almost amusing dealing with stupid people who think they’re smart… But I decide that with this obvious lack of people beating a path to their door, the sign change, and the new construction being completed across the street maybe I can get a reasonably good deal.

But I know better than to do anything without leaving first, sleeping on it and reading the offer forms. I also notice there’s also a place (about 50% sold) a block away for about the same asking price of the place I’m interested in but with much nicer amenities (seriously, didn’t know some of those amenities could be built into Condo’s). So I make an offer (being careful NOT to initial that they can take however much of my deposit they want or that I have no legal recourse) for what the place is worth *to me* given all those market conditions and the nicer place down the street. I make sure to get the offer in before the next meeting as asked by the salesgirls to help get a quicker response.

It takes 3 fucking weeks–after 4 promises that I’ll be called before X-PM on Y-day–to get a reply. Gets to the point that the salesgirls will not answer nor return my call. (Yet through that three weeks their mortgage people call me every week…) Anyway, after the passing of the 4th deadline I start calling every number I can find for the place, and finally manage to track down the broker–who dismisses my offer out of hand AS he admits I am the first AND ONLY offer they’ve had on any of the 21 units!

Seriously, WTF?! But they now have a big balloon tethered to the roof (just like a car dealership!!) proclaiming “100% Financing”. I’m sure that’ll attract quality offers…

And the thing is, that experience is almost less annoying than the other agents I’ve dealt with these last couple weeks. There’re all these new Condo’s going up, and most are unfortunately represented through a traditional real-estate agent instead of anything direct. So the developer is already paying them a percentage to sell, but you go to these open houses and they have somebody–from the same office of course–who wants to be “your” agent and get another 3% of the sales price. Oh yeah, they’re sworn to represent your interests… right. Because your one-time sale means just as much to their office as the developers’ millions in business. And even though the system is setup so they cost themselves $30 in commission for every $1000 they save you “they’ll fight to get you the best price”. Moral of this side-rant: USE REDFIN if you have to use an agent–get 2% back!

I’ll bet none of the current real-estate agents have even worked in a down market… It’s been up, up and away for 10 years in SoCal and the bubble for the last couple years bought them all new German luxo-yachts. I can’t wait to start seeing Porsche Cayennes being towed away by repo men! The pleasure of the rude awakening to come almost makes up for me still being in my crappy apartment…

BTW, PJ correctly pointed out the apostrophe in Condo’s is correct–because it is an abbreviation.

No comments
© TVS Tell us what's what